kevofcov
Member Since: 06 Nov 2007
Location: Other end of M69
Posts: 529
|
Popsdosh
It has been tested in court unsuccessfully on more than one attempt.
Do we know why? Consumer law is not normally open to interpretation. Pretty clear.
|
6th Mar 2022 9:30 am |
|
|
popsdosh
Member Since: 09 Nov 2009
Location: cambs
Posts: 442
|
It is clearly stated in the terms and conditions that the insurer will not pay on any issue that is deemed to be an inherent fault in the vehicle and sadly this has been shown to be the case in court. Its nothing to do with consumer law as the vehicle has run out of the manufacturers warranty period any extended warranty is supplied by a third party provider that uses JLR branding under licence. The same provider also supplies extended third party warranties that are brand linked to the majority of car manufacturers in the UK. JLR do offer some recourse via 'goodwill' however this is liked to your brand loyalty ( ie servicing) and frankly the likelihood you will buy another JLR product.
|
6th Mar 2022 10:29 am |
|
|
kevofcov
Member Since: 06 Nov 2007
Location: Other end of M69
Posts: 529
|
Ah sorry - I meant regarding JLR selling a product with a known fault to its customers and saying nothing
|
6th Mar 2022 4:51 pm |
|
|
galwaygreen
Member Since: 30 Oct 2011
Location: plymouth
Posts: 6525
|
cant understand how you can sell a product with a known inherant defect and its legal..the salesman smiles when hes selling to to you...knowing its krappo
|
7th Mar 2022 12:16 am |
|
|