Advertise on DISCO4.COM
Forum · Gallery · Wiki · Shop · Sponsors
DISCO4.COM > Off Topic - Humour, Rants & Pointless Posts

Unbelievable
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 2 of 2 <12
lynalldiscovery
 


Member Since: 22 Dec 2009
Location: Maidstone
Posts: 7274

United Kingdom 2006 Discovery 3 TDV6 Metropolis LE Auto Bonatti GreyDiscovery 3

Pelyma wrote:
Killing a bill in this manner doesn’t make for better legislation. Reading about the woman who started this is shocking. A bloke stuck a camera up her skirt but because she had knickers on and nobody else saw he didn’t commit a crime. I think if that was my wife or daughter I’d want his testicles mounted on the nearest railings along with his head. The bill was supported by government so would have the time to be debated and any shortfall rectified.


Problem is theres always going to be women who say it happened when it didnt maybe why they are saying there has to be a witness?
So a woman with a vendatta against you could in effect ruin your whole life.

Does anyone remember a few years back when blokes were getting arrested all over the place accussed of rape only for the women to later say it didnt happen.
  
Post #195430915th Jun 2018 8:36 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Pelyma
  


Member Since: 06 Jan 2005
Location: Patching, Sussex
Posts: 15496

England 

Rich, nope, but surely that is why Parliament discuss the bill not just kill it. We had 700 hours discussing a bill that makes it illegal to chase a hare but not a rabbit or a mouse but not a rat surely this would get some time to come up with a sensible description it can’t beyond the wit of man.
 DS3 TDV6 HSE - Silver with Alpaca (old one) Gone
DS3 TDV6 HSE- Silver with Alpaca (new one) Gone
D4 HSE Lux - Montalcino Red Gone
Porsche Cayenne V8 Diesel S 
 
Post #195431015th Jun 2018 8:42 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Pelyma
  


Member Since: 06 Jan 2005
Location: Patching, Sussex
Posts: 15496

England 

lynalldiscovery wrote:
Pelyma wrote:
Killing a bill in this manner doesn’t make for better legislation. Reading about the woman who started this is shocking. A bloke stuck a camera up her skirt but because she had knickers on and nobody else saw he didn’t commit a crime. I think if that was my wife or daughter I’d want his testicles mounted on the nearest railings along with his head. The bill was supported by government so would have the time to be debated and any shortfall rectified.


Problem is theres always going to be women who say it happened when it didnt maybe why they are saying there has to be a witness?
So a woman with a vendatta against you could in effect ruin your whole life.

Does anyone remember a few years back when blokes were getting arrested all over the place accussed of rape only for the women to later say it didnt happen.


So why do we have laws against rape? I would hope because it is wrong and taking photos up women’s skirts is equally wrong. Any law has the potential to be abused or weaponised but it doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have the law.
 DS3 TDV6 HSE - Silver with Alpaca (old one) Gone
DS3 TDV6 HSE- Silver with Alpaca (new one) Gone
D4 HSE Lux - Montalcino Red Gone
Porsche Cayenne V8 Diesel S 
 
Post #195431115th Jun 2018 8:48 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Washwipe
 


Member Since: 19 Apr 2013
Location: Bucks Oxon Herts Border
Posts: 3169

England 

He certainly received some press today.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-44487214
  
Post #195436415th Jun 2018 10:49 pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
bobgolden
 


Member Since: 15 Oct 2010
Location: South Yorkshire
Posts: 907

United Kingdom 2011 Discovery 4 3.0 SDV6 HSE Auto Nara BronzeDiscovery 4

I don’t think I’ve expressed much political opinion in the past but my view is that we now have career politicians instead of public representatives. I’m not so naive as to think that the old politicians didn’t enjoy certain “benefits” but they did at least have proper jobs before becoming MPs.

This snotty lot just study politics at University ( usually ex Polys), then the less thick ones become adivisors before getting elected.
 2010 MX-5 2.0 Sport Tech PRHT
2019 Suzuki Vitara AllGrip

Gone BMW X5 xDrive 30d M Sport (F15)
Gone Disco 4 HSE SD V6
Gone 2008 Jaguar XF 2.7TD Premium Luxury 
 
Post #195437316th Jun 2018 2:20 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
lynalldiscovery
 


Member Since: 22 Dec 2009
Location: Maidstone
Posts: 7274

United Kingdom 2006 Discovery 3 TDV6 Metropolis LE Auto Bonatti GreyDiscovery 3

Pelyma wrote:
lynalldiscovery wrote:
Pelyma wrote:
Killing a bill in this manner doesn’t make for better legislation. Reading about the woman who started this is shocking. A bloke stuck a camera up her skirt but because she had knickers on and nobody else saw he didn’t commit a crime. I think if that was my wife or daughter I’d want his testicles mounted on the nearest railings along with his head. The bill was supported by government so would have the time to be debated and any shortfall rectified.


Problem is theres always going to be women who say it happened when it didnt maybe why they are saying there has to be a witness?
So a woman with a vendatta against you could in effect ruin your whole life.

Does anyone remember a few years back when blokes were getting arrested all over the place accussed of rape only for the women to later say it didnt happen.


So why do we have laws against rape? I would hope because it is wrong and taking photos up women’s skirts is equally wrong. Any law has the potential to be abused or weaponised but it doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have the law.


Theres no equal about it all.
  
Post #195437416th Jun 2018 2:41 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Hardware
 


Member Since: 28 Jun 2016
Location: Hiding under the M60
Posts: 13030

United Kingdom 2011 Discovery 4 3.0 SDV6 XS Auto Sumatra BlackDiscovery 4

He's done himself no favours by killing this … although I do see the reasoning he applied. Stops half-thought-through laws being passed on quiet Fridays, which makes sense but he picked very emotive one this time so perhaps he should not have applied the blanket rule.

But then I thought a little harder about it. He's part of a group of MPs that do this to ensure laws are properly considered … so why on earth, given the nature of this one, didn't ALL the group call out ? that way we wouldn't be discussing what looks on the face of it a mad decision by a solo crazy MP.

or had the rest of his group Censored off early for the weekend ? kind of undermines their seemingly decent stance against the system.
  
Post #195437716th Jun 2018 4:56 am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Display posts from the last:  
Post Reply Back to top
Page 2 of 2 <12
Jump to:  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >


Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



DISCO4.COM Copyright © 2004-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DISCO3.CO.UK RSS Feed - All Forums

DISCO4.COM is independent and not affiliated to Land Rover.
Switch to Mobile Site