- You are currently viewing DISCO4.COM as a guest - Register to take part or Log In
ferrino
Member Since: 02 Aug 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 8
|
after 12 months and 5 suspension malfunctions (plus a few other problems) I decided to return my car to Land Rover manhattan and get a refund under the lemon law rule.
sad, I was excited about getting a land rover. dropped it off today.
|
29th Nov 2005 8:17 pm |
|
|
BN
Member Since: 18 Mar 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 6463
|
ferrino wrote:after 12 months and 5 suspension malfunctions (plus a few other problems) I decided to return my car to Land Rover manhattan and get a refund under the lemon law rule.
sad, I was excited about getting a land rover. dropped it off today.
Sadly that is what Ford have done to Land Rover
|
29th Nov 2005 8:42 pm |
|
|
simon
Member Since: 11 Jan 2005
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 18296
|
To very few vehicles... most are more than happy with their rides... i have had no issues since Jan of this year.
Ferrino... get it exchanged for a new LR3 !
|
29th Nov 2005 9:18 pm |
|
|
GLY 2N
Member Since: 07 Jan 2006
Location: North Wales
Posts: 40
|
Sounds good, 1 years free motoring.
|
12th Jan 2006 2:33 pm |
|
|
MVS
Member Since: 18 Jul 2005
Location: People's Republic of Yorkshire
Posts: 419
|
Yup, its costing me £2.5k to get a new (non faulting one) hopefully after a year here in the UK. Unfortunaltely our 'rejection' process only applies to cars under 6 months old.
|
12th Jan 2006 5:49 pm |
|
|
BN
Member Since: 18 Mar 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 6463
|
MVS wrote:Yup, its costing me £2.5k to get a new (non faulting one) hopefully after a year here in the UK. Unfortunaltely our 'rejection' process only applies to cars under 6 months old.
My second car has just been handed back after 10 months for a cash refund, the first was left abroad broken and refunded in full.
|
12th Jan 2006 6:09 pm |
|
|
MVS
Member Since: 18 Jul 2005
Location: People's Republic of Yorkshire
Posts: 419
|
So it's third time lucky then BN?!
|
12th Jan 2006 6:14 pm |
|
|
BN
Member Since: 18 Mar 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 6463
|
MVS wrote:So it's third time lucky then BN?!
It is time to think for a while and just run the 110's.
|
12th Jan 2006 7:21 pm |
|
|
k1w1
Member Since: 02 Jan 2006
Location: High Wycombe
Posts: 90
|
Hi,
Wondering where you found the 6-month return rule. Searching the net, the general consensus seems to be that a car should be rejected "as soon as possible". Your right to return (assuming it was bought from a dealer) applies whether it was bought new or 2nd hand, but if 2nd hand then additional criteria are considered, such as condition/mileage at purchase.
Seems your rights apply for up to 6 years, although I'm sure any refund would decrease quite quickly after 6 moths.
Does anyone believe this not to be true, or can anyone confirm?
k1w1
|
13th Jan 2006 3:29 pm |
|
|
MVS
Member Since: 18 Jul 2005
Location: People's Republic of Yorkshire
Posts: 419
|
As I understand it, up to 6 months old a fault can be deemed to have been with the vehicle @ manufacture. As such the supplying manufacturer/supplying dealer can be forced to replace the vehicle with a like for like 'new' replacement after being given a reasonable time (usually 14 days written) to repair. After 6 months old it is only possible to force a supplier to (after the same written notice) replace with a vehicle of a similar age, value, and spec. Bear in mind I have done 10k miles on 11 months.
This info I have from my local trading standards, and can easily be confirmed by giving your local office a call.
Bear in mind also that I paid my own hard earned cash for the car, so I cannot use the consumer credit act and go to the finance company and quibble. Which would be easier than pushing my dealer & LR.
(It is also worth looking at the What Car? help pages on their site if you are after pro-former letters to write to a dealer principle.)
|
13th Jan 2006 5:33 pm |
|
|
Glymmer_Man
Member Since: 08 Mar 2006
Location: Sunny Downtown Sydney. I wish it were raining.
Posts: 319
|
Content Deleted Dave
Disco Dreaming
Last edited by Glymmer_Man on 30th Oct 2006 11:58 pm. Edited 1 time in total
|
26th Sep 2006 1:32 am |
|
|
paxton
Member Since: 20 Mar 2006
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 4
|
Glymmer_Man wrote:Wow, if 5 suspension faults qualifies for replacement, we should have had about 3 new ones by now!
I had some suspension faults and then the compressor popped one night. I took it in and the local dealership did all the recall work (software, gas tank, etc.) and now I'm happy as a clam.
On the other hand, my 99 Disco1 has sprung a leak and it'll be at least one arm and half-a-leg to get that fixed.
|
10th Oct 2006 6:15 pm |
|
|
roverdawg
Member Since: 27 Aug 2005
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 40
|
"Wow, if 5 suspension faults qualifies for replacement, we should have had about 3 new ones by now!"
I had experienced hundrends of suspension faults (almost daily basis), 2 new compressors, fuel tank, etc. and was that close to getting rid of mine, too. Luckily, I waited a little bit longer once I got wind of the software updates (about 4 months ago). Since then, not a single fault! I can once again enjoy my LR3! 2005 LR3 HSE
1998 Disco (sold)
|
19th Oct 2006 2:08 am |
|
|
tlt
Member Since: 01 Sep 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 262
|
For what it is worth, I thought I would mention here, that apparently not everyone is defective (knock on wood) I have never had a fault of any kind, since new, except for the low coolant issue (still defective), leaky sunroof (still leaky) and of course the junk tyres they ship on them, otherwise, I am happy really with the truck, and would suggest them. I guess it would be nice for LR to get these issues sorted for all the folks having trouble. I'm wondering, if it is some specific issue, ie: environment, production issue, or something else that is the cause of these issues.
Not that anyone is listening, but perhaps it would be beneficial for have LR ship themselves back a few of these defects and disect it until they can identify and correct the issue, rather than rely on local dealers to sort it out. I guess if I was the manufacter I would have already done so, and perhaps they actually have...
Hang in there with the faults, and hopefully someone will get this sorted.
t
|
12th Dec 2006 8:36 pm |
|
|
10forcash
Member Since: 09 Jun 2005
Location: Ubique
Posts: 16534
|
Might come as a suprise, but not all dealers raise issues with LR, which is sometimes why it takes a while to identify the causal item and rectify the problem - all without disrupting production...
Glad you're as happy with yours as I am with mine though 8)
|
12th Dec 2006 8:39 pm |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
DISCO4.COM Copyright © 2004-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
|
|